Re: variance of shoe
From Stanford Wong's BJ21
Posted by Don Schlesinger on 15 Dec 1997, at 9:35 a.m., in response to Re: variance of shoe, posted by MathProf on 13 Dec 1997, at 6:04 a.m.
Don lists the distribution for positive TC's, and [he puts?] the negatives all together. However the distribution is symmetric, so the negatives have the same distribution as the positives.
Actually, this statement is not exactly true. For any given absolute value of count, the frequency of the negative TC will be somewhat higher than the frequency of the corresponding positive TC. This is a well-known fact, although the magnitude of the differences is not very important.
Don
Responses
- Non-randomness of BJ "sampling" ??? - MathProf -- 15 Dec 1997, at 5:22 p.m.