Dealer Rating Analysis
From Stanford Wong's BJ21
Posted by $mart Gambler on 28 Dec 1997, at 11:01 p.m.
In wrapping up my Reno-Sparks data for 1997, I thought the following dealer rating breakdown might be useful to other single-double deck players.
During 1997 I played with a total of 637 dealers. An A-Dealer is defined as 75% or more penetration and an F-Dealer as 65% or less penetration. Preferential shufflers, etc. are also F’s. C-Dealers are okay in some situations or I just haven’t played sufficiently to categorize.
The summary of the 637 dealers is:
Rating = Quantity (% of Total)
A = 104 (16.3%)
C = 321 (50.4%)
F = 212 (33.3%)I also categorize dealers by apparent age as shown:
Age Range = % of Total (% of total A-Dealers)
20’s = 11.0% (11.5%)
30’s = 37.0% (27.9%)
40’s = 32.8% (33.7%)
50’s = 15.9% (20.2%)
60’s = 3.3% (6.7%)I also categorize dealers by gender as shown:
Gender = % of Total (% of total A-Dealers)
Female = 77.7% (79.8%)
Male = 22.3% (20.2%)Analysis: Forget the young female blondes, look for the gray-haired Grandmas?
$mart Gambler
Responses
- Re: Dealer Rating Analysis - Pete Moss -- 30 Dec 1997, at 2:33 a.m.
- Re: Dealer Rating Analysis - $mart Gambler -- 30 Dec 1997, at 10:11 p.m.
- Re: Dealer Rating Analysis - Pete Moss -- 30 Dec 1997, at 10:50 p.m.
- Re: Dealer Rating Analysis - theCowboy -- 30 Dec 1997, at 3:56 p.m.
- Re: Dealer Rating Analysis - $mart Gambler -- 30 Dec 1997, at 10:13 p.m.
- On Males in 30's - Jack O'Spades -- 31 Dec 1997, at 11:54 a.m.
- Re: On Males in 30's - $mart Gambler -- 31 Dec 1997, at 6:43 p.m.