Unbalanced True Count Proof
by Brett Harris.
Here is how unbalanced systems work : I will use K-O as an example.
Call the 13 card values C(i), then the unbalance per deck is equal to
U = 4* Sum(i=1,13) C(i) = +4 for K-O
Now define the Equivalent Balanced Count B(i) by
B(i) = C(i) - U/52 for each card i=1,13.
For K-O,
B(i) = (-1.077,+0.923,+0.923,+0.923,+0.923,+0.923,+0.923,
-0.077,-0.077,-1.077)
for Ace thru Ten
Notice the B(i) is a balanced count, with Sum(i=1,13) B(i) = 0.
Since B(i) is a balanced count, we define the running count as
Rb(n) = Sum{n cards dealt} B(i),
and the true count
Tb(n) = Rb(n) / (N - d), where N is the total number of decks and d
is the number which have been dealt (d=n/52)
But by the definition of B(i), we have
Rb(n) = Sum{n cards dealt) [ C(i) - U/52 ]
= [ Sum{n cards dealt} C(i) ] - (U/52)*n
= Rc(n) - U * d, where Rc(n) is the unbalanced running count
So therefore
Tb(n) = [ Rc(n) - U*d ] / (N - d)
= [ Rc(n) - N*U + (N - d)*U ] / (N - d)
= [ Rc(n) - N*U ] / (N - d) + U (*)
This equation explains how unbalanced counts work, notice that
if the unbalanced running count Rc(n) is equal to N*U then the true
count Tb(n) is always equal to U, no matter how many decks (d) have
been dealt. The pivot is defined as
pivot = N*U [ = Number of decks * 4 for K-O ],
The equivalent balanced count B(i) for K-O ( or Red7 for that matter )
is very close to Hi-Lo ( actually a little better ) and so when the
K-O running count equals the pivot, one is close to a Hi-Lo TC=+4.
Actually equation (*) shows a little known property of ubalanced counting
systems. Define an unbalanced true count
Tc(n) = [ Rc(n) - pivot ] / (N - d), then
Tc(n) = Tb(n) - U.
Or to put it another way, if you start your running count at -pivot instead
of zero, then it is possible to compute a true count for the unbalanced
system, and this true count is always different from the equivalent balanced
count by U, and so this may be used in conjuction with published indices
for Hi-Lo to use the unbalanced system in the same way as for a balanced
system. Note though that the neutral deck no longer has a true count
of zero, it has a true count of -U.
Cheers,
Brett.
Return to: Table of Contents