Graph
Effect of OverHead on Risk of Ruin
by
The following graph illustrates Risk of Ruin, given that a certain amount of oberhead
F must be meet. It illustrates the Effect of different unit sizes on the Bank which is
required to maintain a given level of risk r. The parameter on the horizontal axis
is is ExpectedValue/OverHead (m/F), which is proportional
to unit size. When this is 2, we will have our optimum unit size in the sense that our required Bank
will be a minimum. On the vertical axis, we plot the required Bank, normalized so that
a value of 1 represents the minimum Bank.
When the betting units is large, so that EV is large relative to F, our graph is
nearly linear, as it is in the classical RoR sitution, when there is no overhead.
However, note that as we decrease the unti size, our required Bank levels off as we reach
the optimal level and then increases percipitously thereafter. When EV=F, our required Bank is
actually infinite.
The actual size of the minumum Bank is given by the following formulas:
| Formulas for Optimal Bank (given Overhead)
|
Bank = -2 * ln(r) * F * [ s/m ] 2
r = exp ( - [ m/s ] 2 B / [ 2 * F ] )
where F = Fixed Expenses (Overhead) in $/Hour.
m = Mean Earnings ($/Hr)
s = Standard Deviation
s2 = Variance($/Hr)
Assumming optimal betting: m = 2 * F
|
May Your Earnings Always Exceed Your Expected Value!